By: John Mount

Copyright 2000


Professor Tyndall filled an experimental glass tube with the vapours of certain acids, iodides and nitrites. The tube was then turned on its side in a level horizontal position, and so arranged that the axis of the tube and parallel concentrated beams of electric light or focused sunlight were coincident. Adjustments were made to the focus until the vapours began to react.

Gradually, oh, so gradually, and to Tyndall’s astonishment, these clouds of vapour began to coalesce, forming into coloured three-dimensional images of animals, plants and other shapes including geometric patterns of spheres, cubes and also pyramids. At one stage during the experiment, Tyndall was amazed to see the swirling clouds suddenly change into the shape of a “serpent’s head”, and as the serpent’s mouth slowly opened a long tendril of cloud emerged, forming into a perfectly shaped tongue. No sooner had this image faded than it was immediately replaced by another, this time of a perfectly formed fish complete with gills, feelers, scales and eyes.

Tyndall, commenting on the “completeness” of this figure, said: The twoness of the animal form was displayed throughout, and no disc, coil or speck existed on one side [of the figure] that did not exist on the other.

This “twoness”, as Tyndall put it, could lend some credibility to the experiment. The fact that every “twin” detail of an image is faithfully reproduced, i.e., both eyes, both ears, etc., suggests that the image is being purposely generated and is not just a coincidental occurrence like watching the clouds in the sky form rough caricatures of known objects.

Regarding the ‘focusing’ of the beams, is it possible that, once the knack of “tuning” the beams of light had been mastered, certain images might then be pre-selected at will?

Tyndall’s detractors had a field day. They pointed out that the phenomenon could easily be explained by the mechanical action of a beam of light, which would normally stir up molecules of vapour into certain shapes like globes and spindles—a process which they said was recently demonstrated by the physicist Sir William Crookes.

Yet they omitted to mention the precisely shaped images of flowers, vases, sea-shells, fish, the serpent’s head and a number of other forms that Tyndall’s experiment produced.

Did Tyndall’s own thoughts physically interfere with the experiment, or do the vapours of certain chemicals have a propensity to form images? No one at this point in time seems to know.

Tyndall, it must be realized, was a scientist of some repute, a Fellow and Director of the Royal Institute, President of the British Association, and disciple and confidant of Michael Faraday. He was a modest and charitable man, according to his peers, and his research work, writings and lectures were greatly appreciated by the scientific community. Not the sort of fellow who was wont to seeing things that weren’t really there.

Another experiment sounding very similar to Tyndall’s was performed by Sir Thomas Browne, a 17th-century physician and author. Browne called it, amongst other things, “Palingencsis...the re-individuality of an incinerated plant”.

Browne, after reducing a plant to ashes by calcination, separated the salts from the ashes and after “special fermentation” placed the salts in a glass vial. He then made the following observations: ...by the heate of embers, or the natural heate of one’s body, the very fortne and idea [of the plant] will bee represented; whiche will suddenly vanish away, the heate being withdrawn from the bottom of the glasse.

A witness described the experiment as it was being performed on a flower:    having.., by calcination disengaged the salts from its ashes and deposited them [the salts] in a glass phial, a chemical mixture [reaction] acted on it, till in the fermen-tation they assumed a bluish and spectral hue. This dust, thus excited by heat, shoots upward into its primitive forms; by sympathy the parts unite and, while each is returning to its destined place, we see distinctly the stalk, the leaves and the flower arise; it is the pale spectre of a flower coming slowly forth from its ashes. The heat passes away, the magical scene declines, till the whole matter again precipitates itself into the chaos at the bottom. This vegetable phoenix thus lies concealed in its cold ashes.

Shades of Semyon Kirlian! Talk about photographing phantom leaves and limbs!

Imagine the revolution these experiments could cause in modern science. These experiments, if proved true, could present the unique possibility of being able to view natures storehouse of “bio-blueprints” or “life ideas’ before (and after) she clothes them in flesh.

Take forensic medicine, for example; burnt evidence could be visually resurrected. And in archaeology, those old ashes and coals of burnt remains could show us how the people actually lived (and died). And would the skin or bone samples of Egyptian mummies and other ancient people properly treated allow us to gaze once more on the finely chiselled features of beautiful Nefcrtiti, or see again that Hellenic smile that once launched a thousand ships?

Another interesting experiment, similar in some respects to those mentioned above (but not politically correct by today’s animal welfare standards), was performed during the 1940s using the Wilson expansion cloud chamber. This chamber, which is filled with a gas or vapour (usually water vapour), is normally used to track the path of atomic and sub-atomic particles.

Dr R. A. Watters, director of the William Bernard Johnston Foundation for Psychological Research in Reno, Nevada, theorized that the human or animal soul exists in the tntra-atomic space between the atoms of human cells. He decided to test his theory using the cloud chamber.

A large grasshopper was placed in the chamber and dispatched with ether. At the precise moment of death, expansion of the water vapour occurred, which in turn triggered a camera and a photograph was taken of the condensation figure. In all, around 40 experiments were carried out using frogs and white mice. According to Watters, in all the tests where the creature permanently died, a “shadow phenomenon” appeared in the chamber, even after eight hours of observation, coinciding with the shape of the creature. However, if the animal revived, no condensation figure would appear on the photograph.

Did Watters photograph the soul of those creatures? Is the soul more easily captured on film as it is leaving its body (with some small amount of the material world still clinging to it) than some time afterwards?

A brief, tantalising account of a French scientists experiments clearly shows how easily momentous discoveries can be made and then how, just as easily, they can fade into obscurity.

In 1856, Dr Johard of Paris declared to a startled press: “ I hold a discovery which frightens me. There are two kinds of electricity; one, brute and blind, is produced by the contact of metals and acids; the other is intelligent and clairvoyant. The brute [one] has followed Jacobii, Bonelli and Moncal, while the intellectual one was following Bois-Robert, Thilorier and Chevalier Duplanty.

The electrical ball or globular electricity [ball lightning?] con tains a thought which disobeys Newton gravity? [ and Mriotte ? ] to follow its own freaks ... we have in the annals of the academy thousands of proofs of the intelligence of the electric bolt...but I remark that I am permitting myself to become indiscreet. A little more and I would have disclosed to you the key which is about to discover to us the universal spirit.

What other potentially world-shaking discoveries lie concealed and forgotten in dusty tomes sitting in equally dusty, out-of-the-way bookshops and libraries?


NEXUS Magazine

Sept./Oct. 2001 Volume 8, Number 5. (Pgs. 41-42)


bar_blbk.jpg - 5566 Bytes

Return to the Words of Wisdom, science menu..

Return to the main menu..

D.U.O Project
Church of the Science of God
La Jolla, California 92038-3131
(858) 220-1604

Church of the Science of GOD, 1993
Web Designed by WebDiva